firefox performance , Windows vs Linux

Tjah, faldt over det modstatte tilfælde med Chromium på slashdot i går:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/d86faf…

Okey så testede jeg .
Dette er desværre en ret halvhjertet indsats , men hvis der kommer en død weekend og noget kaffe tager jeg mig sammen.
Denne test er udelukken en sunspider test , der kun tester performance under diverse javascript øvelser.

system:
Ubuntu 9.04 32 bit er mit OS, fuldt opdateret, håndkompileret 2.6.30 kerne
resten er stanard med wine-1.1.32

Browsers:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091109 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Shiretoko/3.5.5
Total: 2502.2ms

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; da-DK; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15

Total: 5160.8ms

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5
Total: 2391.8m

Altså:
firefox 3.5.5 ubuntu version er
* TOTAL **: *1.05x as slow* 2391.8ms +/- 2.5% 2502.2ms +/-
som windows versionen under wine.
og
** TOTAL **: 2.06x as fast 5160.8ms +/- 2.8% 2502.2ms +/- 4.4% significant
i forhold til den gamle firefox på ubuntu.

5% langsommere til javascript er jo ikke meget
over 100% hurtigere end gamle firefox er tilgengæld flot.

Naturligvis forventer jeg at windows afvirkler firefox endnu hurtigere end wine , og det er da provokerende at per default er Ubuntus firefox langsommere end selv wine afvikling.

Næste skridt vil så være at prøve at kompilere en firefox selv og se om det hjælper.

Til sidst.
Udvidet sunspider output:

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091109 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Shiretoko/3.5.5

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2502.2ms +/- 4.4%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 358.0ms +/- 10.4%
cube: 120.4ms +/- 16.4%
morph: 70.8ms +/- 30.7%
raytrace: 166.8ms +/- 5.1%

access: 347.8ms +/- 4.7%
binary-trees: 102.8ms +/- 13.5%
fannkuch: 147.0ms +/- 8.4%
nbody: 71.0ms +/- 21.2%
nsieve: 27.0ms +/- 45.7%

bitops: 104.0ms +/- 3.0%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 2.8ms +/- 48.6%
bits-in-byte: 21.0ms +/- 0.0%
bitwise-and: 6.4ms +/- 10.6%
nsieve-bits: 73.8ms +/- 3.7%

controlflow: 82.4ms +/- 25.9%
recursive: 82.4ms +/- 25.9%

crypto: 169.0ms +/- 10.2%
aes: 88.8ms +/- 19.1%
md5: 54.0ms +/- 2.3%
sha1: 26.2ms +/- 5.2%

date: 346.8ms +/- 16.9%
format-tofte: 177.6ms +/- 12.3%
format-xparb: 169.2ms +/- 29.1%

math: 133.0ms +/- 9.3%
cordic: 64.6ms +/- 5.2%
partial-sums: 50.6ms +/- 21.5%
spectral-norm: 17.8ms +/- 15.1%

regexp: 171.2ms +/- 7.2%
dna: 171.2ms +/- 7.2%

string: 790.0ms +/- 5.4%
base64: 46.4ms +/- 26.2%
fasta: 167.6ms +/- 14.3%
tagcloud: 215.2ms +/- 6.8%
unpack-code: 243.8ms +/- 5.4%
validate-input: 117.0ms +/- 17.3%

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; da-DK; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102815 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.15

Total: 5160.8ms +/- 2.8%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 628.0ms +/- 5.4%
cube: 221.8ms +/- 6.1%
morph: 194.8ms +/- 13.1%
raytrace: 211.4ms +/- 8.3%

access: 730.0ms +/- 5.9%
binary-trees: 109.6ms +/- 16.1%
fannkuch: 272.4ms +/- 2.2%
nbody: 231.0ms +/- 7.7%
nsieve: 117.0ms +/- 24.7%

bitops: 556.4ms +/- 9.3%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 114.8ms +/- 11.5%
bits-in-byte: 134.8ms +/- 12.1%
bitwise-and: 130.2ms +/- 15.3%
nsieve-bits: 176.6ms +/- 11.0%

controlflow: 93.4ms +/- 5.0%
recursive: 93.4ms +/- 5.0%

crypto: 373.0ms +/- 9.0%
aes: 131.2ms +/- 15.3%
md5: 117.8ms +/- 6.5%
sha1: 124.0ms +/- 14.4%

date: 560.0ms +/- 3.4%
format-tofte: 340.8ms +/- 7.5%
format-xparb: 219.2ms +/- 8.1%

math: 634.4ms +/- 5.1%
cordic: 249.2ms +/- 6.6%
partial-sums: 240.8ms +/- 8.9%
spectral-norm: 144.4ms +/- 8.3%

regexp: 364.4ms +/- 3.7%
dna: 364.4ms +/- 3.7%

string: 1221.2ms +/- 8.2%
base64: 180.4ms +/- 16.5%
fasta: 291.2ms +/- 7.2%
tagcloud: 230.4ms +/- 7.1%
unpack-code: 335.4ms +/- 5.0%
validate-input: 183.8ms +/- 20.8%

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2391.8ms +/- 2.5%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 368.2ms +/- 12.7%
cube: 104.2ms +/- 14.8%
morph: 114.8ms +/- 21.9%
raytrace: 149.2ms +/- 10.2%

access: 317.8ms +/- 9.9%
binary-trees: 97.8ms +/- 14.1%
fannkuch: 134.4ms +/- 11.0%
nbody: 58.6ms +/- 28.8%
nsieve: 27.0ms +/- 23.3%

bitops: 90.2ms +/- 3.8%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 3.6ms +/- 18.9%
bits-in-byte: 19.0ms +/- 26.2%
bitwise-and: 5.6ms +/- 12.2%
nsieve-bits: 62.0ms +/- 2.8%

controlflow: 80.4ms +/- 20.6%
recursive: 80.4ms +/- 20.6%

crypto: 149.0ms +/- 2.0%
aes: 85.4ms +/- 4.2%
md5: 40.6ms +/- 1.7%
sha1: 23.0ms +/- 8.5%

date: 408.4ms +/- 9.0%
format-tofte: 193.4ms +/- 11.9%
format-xparb: 215.0ms +/- 10.7%

math: 130.4ms +/- 1.1%
cordic: 72.8ms +/- 2.2%
partial-sums: 39.8ms +/- 5.1%
spectral-norm: 17.8ms +/- 5.8%

regexp: 167.4ms +/- 6.2%
dna: 167.4ms +/- 6.2%

string: 680.0ms +/- 5.2%
base64: 41.4ms +/- 1.6%
fasta: 149.8ms +/- 6.4%
tagcloud: 161.0ms +/- 9.7%
unpack-code: 223.8ms +/- 5.5%
validate-input: 104.0ms +/- 13.2%

spændende :) - har du prøvet swiftfox eller hvad det hedder nu om dage?